This blog focuses almost exclusively on criminal law and criminal procedure, making this posting something of a oddity. With that said, however, this posting may certainly be viewed as a comment on an issue that is significant in any criminal case, which is the selection of defense counsel. When it…
New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney Blog
United States v. Nesbeth and Collateral Consequences of Sentences
Many defendants focus exclusively on only one issue in their case – Am I going to jail? If there is even a possibility that this question may be answered affirmatively, follow-up issues concerns the length of the sentence and the facility where it may be served (e.g., state prison vs.…
State v. Bivins and Limits on “All-Persons-Present” Search Warrants
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the analogous provisions of New Jersey state law, set rules concerning the manner in which officers can search a person, and/or their home, office or vehicle. This body of law plays a central role in maintaining personal liberty and…
Molina-Martinez v. United States – New Sentencing Guidelines Decision Focuses on Remedy for Errors in Sentencing Calculation
We have written before about federal sentencing issues. A recent US Supreme Court decision again focuses our attention on this important topic and, specifically, the central role that the advisory guidelines play in the federal sentencing process, and how sentencing mistakes can – and should – be corrected. By way…
18-Year Old Live-Streams Friend’s Rape – and is Charged as a Sex Offender
Prior articles on this blog have discussed our increasing dependency on our electronic devices. Many members of my generation are still getting somewhat used to smart phones, I-pads, and the like. However, for our children who have grown up with them, using these devices is perfectly natural and an ordinary…
State v. McFarlane – Trial Judge Must Consider Unique Facts and Circumstances of Case and Defendant When Formulating Sentence, and Must Place Reasoning on Record
One of the many defendants I have represented in federal district court in New Jersey resolved his case by pleading guilty to certain offenses that typically call for the imposition of a prison sentence. After long and difficult negotiations with the US Attorney’s Office, and in light of other facts…
Courts Under Assault
A free and independent judiciary is a cornerstone of our constitutional structure. In our system, judges are supposed to remain free of political pressure to the fullest extent possible so that they can interpret and apply our laws without having to fear political reprisals resulting from their decisions. Anybody who…
State v. Cain and State v. Simms – NJ Supreme Court Reaffirms the Role of the Jury as Trier of Facts
Every participant in a jury trial has a defined role. The judge manages the trial and acts as a judge of the law. S/he will rule on legal issues that arise during pre-trial proceedings, supervise jury selection, rule on issues of law that arise during trial, instruct the jury on…
State v. Bass and Confrontation Clause Rights
Clients often attempt to articulate facts substantiating a violation of their constitutional rights. Sometimes, the client’s description of the relevant facts can be used to at least articulate a legal basis for such a violation. More frequently, however, the client’s description bears little, if any, relation to a constitutional violation. …
State v. Thompson and Race-Based Jury Selection
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. Saladin Thompson, which discusses the use of peremptory challenges to strike potential jurors based on their race. The decision focuses our attention on jury selection, which is one of the most important and difficult phases of any jury trial. Many clients…